Figma vs new.website: Design Files vs Live Websites
Figma revolutionized design collaboration and became the standard for creating beautiful website designs. But there's a crucial gap between having a beautiful design file and having a working website that grows your business.
Output Comparison
Figma:
- • Beautiful design files
- • Static visual representations
- • Requires development to go live
- • Design collaboration focused
new.website:
- • Working websites
- • Functional, interactive sites
- • Instantly live and operational
- • Business results focused
The Design-to-Development Gap
The traditional process goes: design in Figma, hand off to developers, wait for development, test, revise, and finally launch. This process can take weeks or months, and the final result often differs from the original design.
new.website collapses this entire process into a single step. Describe your needs, get a working website. No handoffs, no development delays, no design-to-code inconsistencies.
Agency Owner Insight
“We used to spend weeks in Figma perfecting designs, then more weeks getting them developed. Now we use new.website to create working prototypes instantly, then iterate based on real user feedback instead of design assumptions.”
— Mark T., Digital Agency Owner
The Modern Approach
The web has evolved beyond static design files. Today's businesses need websites that work immediately, adapt quickly, and deliver results from day one.
new.website represents this evolution: instead of designing websites, we conversation them into existence. Instead of static beauty, we create functional elegance. Instead of eventually launching, we go live immediately.